> ## Documentation Index
> Fetch the complete documentation index at: https://docs.aigoframework.com/llms.txt
> Use this file to discover all available pages before exploring further.

# 13 AIGO AI Management Review Template v0.1

# AIGO — AI Governance Operating Framework

## AI Management Review Template

**Version:** 0.1
**Status:** Draft
**Working Name:** AIGO
**Full Name:** AI Governance Operating Framework
**Document Identifier:** `AIGO-TPL-013`
**Document Type:** AI Management Review Template
**Template Purpose:** Controlled Review of AI Governance Performance, Risk, Controls, Decisions, and Continual Improvement

***

# 1. Template Purpose

This template provides the controlled structure for conducting and documenting management review of the organization's AI governance arrangements under the AIGO AI Governance Operating Framework.

Management review provides a structured mechanism for appropriate leadership or governance authority to evaluate whether AI governance remains:

* suitable;
* adequate;
* effective;
* risk-appropriate;
* properly resourced;
* responsive to changes;
* capable of achieving intended governance outcomes.

Management review should consider information from across the AIGO governance lifecycle, including:

* AI portfolio;
* organizational context;
* governance performance;
* AI classification;
* risk;
* controls;
* monitoring;
* incidents;
* changes;
* assurance;
* accepted residual risk;
* stakeholder feedback;
* regulatory developments;
* third-party dependencies;
* continual improvement.

This template does not replace the organization's approved AIGO Management Review or Governance Procedure.

***

# 2. Management Review Instructions

Complete all applicable sections.

Where information is unavailable, record:

**Pending — \[reason]**

Where a section does not apply, record:

**Not Applicable — \[reason]**

Management review decisions should be supported by controlled evidence.

Use stable identifiers wherever possible.

Recommended identifiers include:

* Governance Record ID;
* Management Review ID;
* AI System ID;
* Risk ID;
* Control ID;
* Incident ID;
* Change ID;
* Assurance ID;
* Approval ID;
* Improvement ID;
* Evidence ID;
* Decision ID.

***

# 3. Management Review Record

## 3.1 Identification

**Management Review ID:**

**Review Version:**

**Review Title:**

**Review Type:**

* Periodic
* Triggered
* Post-Incident
* Post-Assurance
* Post-Material Change
* Strategic
* Annual
* Other

**Review Status:**

* Draft
* Scheduled
* In Progress
* Awaiting Inputs
* Under Governance Review
* Decision Pending
* Approved
* Closed
* Follow-Up Required

**Review Owner:**

**Review Chair:**

**Review Secretary / Coordinator:**

**Review Authority:**

**Date Scheduled:**

**Review Date:**

**Next Review Date:**

***

# 4. Review Authority and Governance

## 4.1 Review Authority

**Management / Governance Body:**

**Authority Basis:**

## 4.2 Participants

| Participant | Role | Responsibility in Review | Decision Authority |
| ----------- | ---- | ------------------------ | ------------------ |
|             |      |                          |                    |
|             |      |                          |                    |
|             |      |                          |                    |

## 4.3 Required Functions

Consider representation from:

* executive management;
* AI governance;
* risk;
* business ownership;
* technical ownership;
* privacy;
* security;
* legal / compliance;
* assurance;
* data governance;
* other relevant functions.

**Applicable Participants:**

## 4.4 Quorum

**Quorum Requirement:**

**Quorum Achieved:**

**Rationale if Not Achieved:**

***

# 5. Review Scope and Period

## 5.1 Review Period

**From:**

**To:**

## 5.2 Organizational Scope

**Business Units / Functions Covered:**

## 5.3 AI Portfolio Scope

**AI Systems / Portfolio Covered:**

## 5.4 Geographic Scope

**Jurisdictions / Locations Covered:**

## 5.5 Lifecycle Scope

Management review may consider all applicable AIGO lifecycle stages:

* Govern
* Identify
* Classify
* Assess
* Treat
* Approve
* Deploy
* Operate
* Monitor
* Assure
* Improve
* Change
* Continue
* Retire

**Applicable Stages:**

## 5.6 Review Exclusions

**Excluded Areas:**

**Exclusion Rationale:**

***

# 6. Review Objectives

## 6.1 Primary Objectives

The review should determine whether:

* AI governance remains suitable;
* AI governance remains adequate;
* AI governance is operating effectively;
* risks remain within approved tolerance;
* controls remain effective;
* monitoring is effective;
* incidents and changes are appropriately governed;
* assurance findings are addressed;
* governance objectives are being achieved;
* improvement actions are appropriate.

**Applicable Objectives:**

## 6.2 Review Questions

**Key Questions for Management:**

*
*
*

***

# 7. Review Inputs

## 7.1 Governance Inputs

Management review may consider:

* governance structure;
* governance decisions;
* governance metrics;
* governance exceptions;
* changes in accountability;
* committee activity.

**Governance Inputs:**

## 7.2 AI Portfolio Inputs

**AI Inventory Summary:**

**Number of AI Systems:**

**Number of New Systems:**

**Number of Retired Systems:**

**Number of Restricted / Suspended Systems:**

***

# 8. AI Portfolio Status

## 8.1 Portfolio Summary

| Category              | Count | Change from Previous Review | Key Observation |
| --------------------- | ----: | --------------------------: | --------------- |
| Registered AI Systems |       |                             |                 |
| Under Assessment      |       |                             |                 |
| Approved              |       |                             |                 |
| Operational           |       |                             |                 |
| Restricted            |       |                             |                 |
| Suspended             |       |                             |                 |
| Retiring              |       |                             |                 |
| Retired               |       |                             |                 |

## 8.2 Classification Distribution

| Classification | Number of Systems | Trend | Key Observation |
| -------------- | ----------------: | ----- | --------------- |
| Class 1        |                   |       |                 |
| Class 2        |                   |       |                 |
| Class 3        |                   |       |                 |
| Class 4        |                   |       |                 |

## 8.3 Portfolio Risk Profile

**Portfolio Risk Summary:**

***

# 9. Organizational Context and Changes

## 9.1 Context Changes

Consider changes to:

* organizational structure;
* strategy;
* business objectives;
* technology;
* market conditions;
* risk environment;
* stakeholders;
* legal entities;
* jurisdictions;
* third parties.

**Changes Since Previous Review:**

## 9.2 AI Governance Implications

**Implications for AI Governance:**

## 9.3 Governance Response

**Required Response:**

***

# 10. Strategic AI Governance Alignment

## 10.1 Strategic Objectives

**Relevant Organizational Strategic Objectives:**

## 10.2 AI Governance Alignment

**How AI governance supports strategic objectives:**

## 10.3 Strategic Gaps

**Identified Gaps:**

## 10.4 Strategic Decisions Required

**Decisions:**

***

# 11. Governance Performance

## 11.1 Governance Objectives

| Objective | Target | Actual | Status | Owner |
| --------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ----- |
|           |        |        |        |       |
|           |        |        |        |       |
|           |        |        |        |       |

## 11.2 Governance Metrics

| Metric | Definition | Target | Actual | Trend | Status |
| ------ | ---------- | -----: | -----: | ----- | ------ |
|        |            |        |        |       |        |
|        |            |        |        |       |        |
|        |            |        |        |       |        |

## 11.3 Governance Performance Conclusion

**Conclusion:**

***

# 12. Risk Performance

## 12.1 Overall Risk Position

**Overall AI Risk Position:**

## 12.2 Risk Distribution

| Risk Level | Number of Risks | Trend | Key Observation |
| ---------- | --------------: | ----- | --------------- |
| Low        |                 |       |                 |
| Medium     |                 |       |                 |
| High       |                 |       |                 |
| Critical   |                 |       |                 |

## 12.3 Highest Risks

| Risk ID | AI System | Risk | Level | Owner | Treatment Status |
| ------- | --------- | ---- | ----- | ----- | ---------------- |
|         |           |      |       |       |                  |
|         |           |      |       |       |                  |
|         |           |      |       |       |                  |

## 12.4 Risk Above Tolerance

**Risks Above Approved Tolerance:**

## 12.5 Emerging Risks

**Emerging AI Risks:**

## 12.6 Risk Governance Conclusion

**Conclusion:**

***

# 13. Risk Acceptance Review

## 13.1 Accepted Residual Risks

| Risk Acceptance ID | Risk ID | Residual Risk | Acceptance Authority | Expiry / Review | Status |
| ------------------ | ------- | ------------- | -------------------- | --------------- | ------ |
|                    |         |               |                      |                 |        |
|                    |         |               |                      |                 |        |

## 13.2 Acceptance Conditions

**Open Acceptance Conditions:**

## 13.3 Expiring Acceptance

**Risk Acceptances Requiring Renewal / Reassessment:**

## 13.4 Management Decision

**Decision:**

* Continue Acceptance
* Modify Conditions
* Reduce Risk
* Escalate
* Suspend Acceptance
* Revoke Acceptance
* Other

**Rationale:**

***

# 14. Control Performance

## 14.1 Control Environment

**Overall Control Environment:**

* Effective
* Generally Effective
* Partially Effective
* Ineffective
* Unable to Conclude

**Rationale:**

## 14.2 Control Rating Distribution

| Rating              | Number of Controls | Trend |
| ------------------- | -----------------: | ----- |
| Effective           |                    |       |
| Partially Effective |                    |       |
| Ineffective         |                    |       |
| Not Implemented     |                    |       |
| Not Tested          |                    |       |

## 14.3 Critical Control Status

**Critical Controls Requiring Attention:**

## 14.4 Control Findings

| Finding ID | Control ID | Finding | Severity | Owner | Status |
| ---------- | ---------- | ------- | -------- | ----- | ------ |
|            |            |         |          |       |        |
|            |            |         |          |       |        |

## 14.5 Control Performance Conclusion

**Conclusion:**

***

# 15. Monitoring Performance

## 15.1 Monitoring Status

**Overall Monitoring Status:**

* Normal
* Acceptable with Observations
* Warning
* Escalated
* Critical

**Rationale:**

## 15.2 Key Monitoring Indicators

| Indicator | Target / Threshold | Actual | Trend | Status | Action |
| --------- | ------------------ | -----: | ----- | ------ | ------ |
|           |                    |        |       |        |        |
|           |                    |        |       |        |        |
|           |                    |        |       |        |        |

## 15.3 Significant Monitoring Deviations

**Deviations:**

## 15.4 Enhanced Monitoring

**AI Systems Under Enhanced Monitoring:**

## 15.5 Monitoring Governance Conclusion

**Conclusion:**

***

# 16. Incident Performance

## 16.1 Incident Summary

| Severity      | Number | Open | Closed | Trend |
| ------------- | -----: | ---: | -----: | ----- |
| Informational |        |      |        |       |
| Low           |        |      |        |       |
| Medium        |        |      |        |       |
| High          |        |      |        |       |
| Critical      |        |      |        |       |

## 16.2 Significant Incidents

| Incident ID | AI System | Severity | Description | Status | Residual Risk |
| ----------- | --------- | -------- | ----------- | ------ | ------------- |
|             |           |          |             |        |               |
|             |           |          |             |        |               |

## 16.3 Incident Trends

**Observed Trends:**

## 16.4 Incident Lessons

**Key Lessons:**

## 16.5 Incident Governance Conclusion

**Conclusion:**

***

# 17. Change Performance

## 17.1 Change Summary

| Change Status | Number | Trend |
| ------------- | -----: | ----- |
| Submitted     |        |       |
| Approved      |        |       |
| Deployed      |        |       |
| Deferred      |        |       |
| Rejected      |        |       |
| Rolled Back   |        |       |
| Closed        |        |       |

## 17.2 Material Changes

| Change ID | AI System | Description | Risk Impact | Approval | Status |
| --------- | --------- | ----------- | ----------- | -------- | ------ |
|           |           |             |             |          |        |
|           |           |             |             |          |        |

## 17.3 Change-Related Incidents

**Incidents Related to Changes:**

## 17.4 Change Governance Conclusion

**Conclusion:**

***

# 18. Classification Performance

## 18.1 Classification Changes

**Number of Reclassifications:**

## 18.2 Classification Accuracy / Appropriateness

**Assessment:**

## 18.3 Classification Issues

**Issues:**

## 18.4 Reclassification Decisions

**Required Decisions:**

***

# 19. Approval Performance

## 19.1 Approval Status

| Approval Status          | Number | Trend |
| ------------------------ | -----: | ----- |
| Approved                 |        |       |
| Approved with Conditions |        |       |
| Deferred                 |        |       |
| Rejected                 |        |       |
| Suspended                |        |       |
| Revoked                  |        |       |

## 19.2 Overdue Conditions

**Open / Overdue Approval Conditions:**

## 19.3 Approval Governance Conclusion

**Conclusion:**

***

# 20. Human Oversight Performance

## 20.1 Oversight Indicators

| Indicator | Target | Actual | Trend | Status |
| --------- | -----: | -----: | ----- | ------ |
|           |        |        |       |        |
|           |        |        |       |        |

## 20.2 Human Oversight Findings

**Findings:**

## 20.3 Automation Bias / Human Reliance

**Observed Issues:**

## 20.4 Human Oversight Conclusion

**Conclusion:**

***

# 21. Security and Privacy Performance

## 21.1 Security Summary

**Security Governance Status:**

**Significant Security Events:**

## 21.2 Privacy Summary

**Privacy Governance Status:**

**Significant Privacy Events:**

## 21.3 Security / Privacy Decisions

**Required Decisions:**

***

# 22. Fairness, Impact, and Responsible AI Performance

## 22.1 Fairness Status

**Overall Fairness Status:**

## 22.2 Significant Findings

**Findings:**

## 22.3 Affected-Person Impact

**Observed / Potential Impact:**

## 22.4 Corrective Actions

**Actions:**

## 22.5 Governance Decision

**Decision:**

***

# 23. Assurance Performance

## 23.1 Assurance Summary

| Assurance Type | Number | Completed | Open | Trend |
| -------------- | -----: | --------: | ---: | ----- |
| Governance     |        |           |      |       |
| Control        |        |           |      |       |
| Technical      |        |           |      |       |
| Independent    |        |           |      |       |
| Other          |        |           |      |       |

## 23.2 Assurance Findings

| Finding ID | Area | Severity | Owner | Due Date | Status |
| ---------- | ---- | -------- | ----- | -------- | ------ |
|            |      |          |       |          |        |
|            |      |          |       |          |        |

## 23.3 Repeat Findings

**Repeat / Recurring Findings:**

## 23.4 Assurance Conclusion

**Conclusion:**

***

# 24. Third-Party Governance Performance

## 24.1 Supplier Summary

| Supplier / Provider | Systems / Services | Risk | Assurance Status | Incidents | Changes |
| ------------------- | ------------------ | ---- | ---------------- | --------- | ------- |
|                     |                    |      |                  |           |         |
|                     |                    |      |                  |           |         |

## 24.2 Supplier Issues

**Issues:**

## 24.3 Supplier Decisions

**Required Decisions:**

***

# 25. Regulatory and External Requirements

## 25.1 Regulatory Changes

**Changes in Laws / Regulations / Standards:**

## 25.2 Compliance Impact

**Governance Impact:**

## 25.3 Required Actions

**Actions:**

## 25.4 Regulatory Risk

**Regulatory Risk Status:**

***

# 26. Governance Exceptions

## 26.1 Open Exceptions

| Exception ID | Requirement | Reason | Risk | Owner | Expiry | Status |
| ------------ | ----------- | ------ | ---- | ----- | ------ | ------ |
|              |             |        |      |       |        |        |
|              |             |        |      |       |        |        |

## 26.2 Expiring Exceptions

**Exceptions Requiring Decision:**

## 26.3 Exception Decision

**Decision:**

***

# 27. Resource and Capability Review

## 27.1 Staffing

**Adequacy of Governance Staffing:**

## 27.2 Competence

**Competence / Training Adequacy:**

## 27.3 Technology

**Technology / Tooling Adequacy:**

## 27.4 Financial Resources

**Resource / Budget Adequacy:**

## 27.5 External Capability

**Third-Party / External Support Adequacy:**

## 27.6 Resource Decisions

**Required Resource Decisions:**

***

# 28. Documentation and Evidence Quality

## 28.1 Documentation Status

**Documentation Adequacy:**

* Adequate
* Partially Adequate
* Inadequate

**Rationale:**

## 28.2 Evidence Quality

**Overall Evidence Quality:**

* Strong
* Adequate
* Moderate
* Weak
* Insufficient

**Rationale:**

## 28.3 Evidence Gaps

**Material Evidence Gaps:**

## 28.4 Document-Control Issues

**Issues:**

***

# 29. Stakeholder Feedback

## 29.1 Feedback Sources

Potential sources include:

* users;
* affected persons;
* customers;
* employees;
* management;
* regulators;
* suppliers;
* assurance;
* incident management.

**Feedback Sources:**

## 29.2 Significant Feedback

**Key Feedback:**

## 29.3 Governance Implications

**Implications:**

***

# 30. Governance Maturity

## 30.1 Current Maturity

**Current AIGO Governance Maturity Level:**

**Maturity Assessment Reference:**

## 30.2 Maturity Strengths

*
*
*

## 30.3 Maturity Gaps

*
*
*

## 30.4 Maturity Improvement Priorities

*
*
*

***

# 31. Continual Improvement

## 31.1 Improvement Sources

Improvement opportunities may originate from:

* risk assessments;
* control assessments;
* incidents;
* monitoring;
* assurance;
* management review;
* stakeholder feedback;
* regulatory developments;
* technology developments;
* lessons learned.

**Sources Considered:**

## 31.2 Improvement Register

| Improvement ID | Source | Description | Owner | Priority | Target Date | Status |
| -------------- | ------ | ----------- | ----- | -------- | ----------- | ------ |
|                |        |             |       |          |             |        |
|                |        |             |       |          |             |        |
|                |        |             |       |          |             |        |

## 31.3 Priority Improvements

**Priority Improvements:**

***

# 32. Opportunities for Improvement

## 32.1 Governance Opportunities

**Opportunities:**

## 32.2 Risk Opportunities

**Opportunities:**

## 32.3 Control Opportunities

**Opportunities:**

## 32.4 Technology Opportunities

**Opportunities:**

## 32.5 Capability Opportunities

**Opportunities:**

***

# 33. Management Review Analysis

## 33.1 What Is Working Well?

**Strengths:**

*
*
*

## 33.2 What Requires Attention?

**Areas Requiring Attention:**

*
*
*

## 33.3 What Has Changed?

**Material Changes:**

*
*
*

## 33.4 What Is Emerging?

**Emerging Risks / Issues / Opportunities:**

*
*
*

***

# 34. Management Decisions

## 34.1 Decision Register

| Decision ID | Decision | Rationale | Owner | Due Date | Evidence | Status |
| ----------- | -------- | --------- | ----- | -------- | -------- | ------ |
|             |          |           |       |          |          |        |
|             |          |           |       |          |          |        |
|             |          |           |       |          |          |        |

## 34.2 Possible Decisions

Management may decide to:

* continue;
* improve;
* change;
* increase monitoring;
* strengthen controls;
* reassess risk;
* reclassify;
* restrict;
* suspend;
* retire;
* allocate resources;
* change governance requirements;
* commission additional assurance.

**Selected Decisions:**

***

# 35. Governance Changes

## 35.1 Governance Changes Required

**Changes to governance structure, roles, authority, policies, procedures, controls, or requirements:**

## 35.2 Governance Change Actions

| Change ID | Governance Change | Owner | Priority | Target Date | Status |
| --------- | ----------------- | ----- | -------- | ----------- | ------ |
|           |                   |       |          |             |        |
|           |                   |       |          |             |        |

***

# 36. Risk and Control Decisions

## 36.1 Risk Decisions

**Required Risk Decisions:**

## 36.2 Control Decisions

**Required Control Decisions:**

## 36.3 Monitoring Decisions

**Required Monitoring Decisions:**

## 36.4 Assurance Decisions

**Required Assurance Decisions:**

***

# 37. Management Review Decision

## 37.1 Overall Governance Decision

**Decision:**

* Continue
* Continue with Conditions
* Improve
* Change
* Restrict
* Suspend
* Retire
* Escalate
* Other

## 37.2 Decision Rationale

**Rationale:**

## 37.3 Conditions

| Condition ID | Condition | Owner | Due Date | Verification | Status |
| ------------ | --------- | ----- | -------- | ------------ | ------ |
|              |           |       |          |              |        |
|              |           |       |          |              |        |

***

# 38. Management Review Conclusion

## 38.1 Suitability

**Is the AI governance arrangement suitable for the organization?**

* Yes
* Partially
* No

**Rationale:**

## 38.2 Adequacy

**Is the governance arrangement adequate for the current AI portfolio and risk environment?**

* Yes
* Partially
* No

**Rationale:**

## 38.3 Effectiveness

**Is the governance arrangement operating effectively?**

* Yes
* Partially
* No
* Unable to Conclude

**Rationale:**

## 38.4 Overall Conclusion

**Overall Management Review Conclusion:**

***

# 39. Action Plan

| Action ID | Decision / Action | Source | Owner | Priority | Target Date | Evidence | Status |
| --------- | ----------------- | ------ | ----- | -------- | ----------- | -------- | ------ |
|           |                   |        |       |          |             |          |        |
|           |                   |        |       |          |             |          |        |
|           |                   |        |       |          |             |          |        |

## 39.1 Action Prioritization

**Priority Actions:**

***

# 40. Follow-Up

## 40.1 Follow-Up Requirements

**Follow-Up Required:**

## 40.2 Follow-Up Owner

**Owner:**

## 40.3 Follow-Up Date

**Date:**

## 40.4 Follow-Up Evidence

**Evidence IDs:**

## 40.5 Action Closure

**Closure Criteria:**

***

# 41. Evidence Profile

## 41.1 Evidence Repository

**Management Review Evidence Repository:**

**Evidence Owner:**

## 41.2 Evidence Register

| Evidence ID | Evidence Type | Description | Owner | Date | Location | Status |
| ----------- | ------------- | ----------- | ----- | ---- | -------- | ------ |
|             |               |             |       |      |          |        |
|             |               |             |       |      |          |        |
|             |               |             |       |      |          |        |

## 41.3 Evidence Completeness

**Evidence Status:**

* Complete
* Substantially Complete
* Partially Complete
* Incomplete

**Evidence Gaps:**

***

# 42. Review Traceability

The management review should maintain traceability to relevant AIGO records.

| AIGO Record             | Identifier |
| ----------------------- | ---------- |
| Governance Record       |            |
| AI System Registration  |            |
| AI System Profile       |            |
| Classification Records  |            |
| Risk Assessments        |            |
| Risk Acceptance Records |            |
| Control Assessments     |            |
| Monitoring Records      |            |
| Incident Records        |            |
| Change Records          |            |
| Approval Records        |            |
| Assurance Records       |            |
| Improvement Records     |            |
| Retirement Records      |            |
| Evidence Records        |            |

***

# 43. Management Review Traceability Model

```text id="1j6hn5" theme={null}
Organizational Context
        ↓
AI Portfolio
        ↓
Governance Objectives
        ↓
Risk
        ↓
Controls
        ↓
Monitoring
        ↓
Incidents
        ↓
Changes
        ↓
Assurance
        ↓
Stakeholder Feedback
        ↓
Management Review
        ↓
Decision
        ↓
Action
        ↓
Verification
        ↓
Continual Improvement
```

***

# 44. Review Approval

## 44.1 Prepared By

**Name:**

**Role:**

**Date:**

## 44.2 Reviewed By

**Name:**

**Role:**

**Date:**

## 44.3 Approved By

**Name:**

**Role:**

**Date:**

## 44.4 Approval Decision

**Decision:**

* Approved
* Approved with Conditions
* Returned for Additional Review
* Deferred
* Rejected

**Conditions:**

***

# 45. Review Schedule

## 45.1 Periodic Review

**Review Frequency:**

**Next Review Date:**

**Review Owner:**

## 45.2 Triggered Review

A management review may be triggered by:

* significant incidents;
* material AI-system changes;
* significant risk changes;
* critical control failures;
* major assurance findings;
* regulatory developments;
* strategic changes;
* significant stakeholder concerns;
* major technology changes;
* material governance deficiencies.

**Additional Triggers:**

***

# 46. Review Change History

| Version | Date | Change                    | Changed By | Reviewer | Approval |
| ------- | ---- | ------------------------- | ---------- | -------- | -------- |
| 0.1     |      | Initial management review |            |          |          |
|         |      |                           |            |          |          |

***

# 47. Management Review Completion Checklist

* [ ] Management Review ID assigned
* [ ] Review authority identified
* [ ] Participants identified
* [ ] Quorum assessed
* [ ] Review scope defined
* [ ] Review period defined
* [ ] AI portfolio reviewed
* [ ] Organizational context reviewed
* [ ] Strategic alignment reviewed
* [ ] Governance performance reviewed
* [ ] Risk performance reviewed
* [ ] Risk acceptance reviewed
* [ ] Control performance reviewed
* [ ] Monitoring reviewed
* [ ] Incident performance reviewed
* [ ] Change performance reviewed
* [ ] Classification performance reviewed
* [ ] Approval performance reviewed
* [ ] Human oversight reviewed
* [ ] Security / privacy reviewed
* [ ] Fairness / impact reviewed where applicable
* [ ] Assurance performance reviewed
* [ ] Third-party governance reviewed
* [ ] Regulatory developments reviewed
* [ ] Governance exceptions reviewed
* [ ] Resources and capability reviewed
* [ ] Documentation and evidence reviewed
* [ ] Stakeholder feedback reviewed
* [ ] Governance maturity reviewed
* [ ] Continual improvement reviewed
* [ ] Opportunities identified
* [ ] Management decisions recorded
* [ ] Governance changes identified
* [ ] Action plan established
* [ ] Follow-up requirements established
* [ ] Evidence retained
* [ ] Review conclusion recorded
* [ ] Review approved
* [ ] Next review date established

***

# 48. Template Usage Instructions

This template should be completed according to the organization's approved AIGO governance and management-review requirements.

Management review should be based on current and reliable information.

The review should consider whether the AI governance arrangement remains:

* suitable for organizational objectives;
* adequate for the current AI portfolio;
* proportionate to AI risk;
* effective in practice;
* appropriately resourced;
* responsive to incidents, changes, and emerging risks.

Management review should not be treated as a purely administrative meeting.

Where material weaknesses are identified, the review should result in documented decisions and actions.

Decisions should have:

* an accountable owner;
* a due date;
* appropriate priority;
* verification requirements;
* supporting evidence.

Management review should feed directly into continual improvement.

***

# 49. Template Governance

## 49.1 Template Owner

**Template Owner:**

## 49.2 Template Review

**Review Frequency:**

**Next Review Date:**

## 49.3 Template Change Control

Changes to this template should be managed through the applicable AIGO document and change-management process.

Material changes should consider their effect on:

* AI Governance Procedure;
* Management Review requirements;
* AI Risk Assessment;
* AI Control Assessment;
* Monitoring;
* Incident Management;
* Change Management;
* Assurance;
* Risk Acceptance;
* Continuous Improvement;
* schemas;
* mappings;
* tools.

***

# 50. Document Control

| Field               | Value                                |
| ------------------- | ------------------------------------ |
| Document            | AIGO — AI Management Review Template |
| Version             | 0.1                                  |
| Status              | Draft                                |
| Document Identifier | `AIGO-TPL-013`                       |
| Document Type       | AI Management Review Template        |
| Template Owner      |                                      |
| Approved By         |                                      |
| Approval Date       |                                      |
| Effective Date      |                                      |
| Next Review Date    |                                      |

***

# 51. Template Status

**Document:** AIGO — AI Management Review Template

**Version:** 0.1

**Status:** Draft

**Working Name:** AIGO

**Full Name:** AI Governance Operating Framework

**Document Identifier:** `AIGO-TPL-013`

**Document Type:** AI Management Review Template

This template provides the controlled structure for reviewing the suitability, adequacy, effectiveness, risk position, control environment, operational performance, governance capability, and continual-improvement requirements of the AIGO AI Governance Operating Framework.

***

# 52. End of Template

**AIGO — AI Management Review Template**

**Document ID:** `AIGO-TPL-013`

**Version:** 0.1

**Status:** Draft

**End of Template**